Login Contact Us
E-ISSN : 2148-9696
Crescent Journal of
Medical and Biological Sciences
Apr 2018, Vol 5, Issue 2
Advanced Search
Title
Authors
Keyword
Poll
How do you find the scientific quality of the published articles on our web site?
Original Article
Role of History Taking in Differential Diagnosis of Small Airway Disease: A Pilot Study on 32 Cases
Ali Amiri1,2, Seyyed Amir Yasin Ahmadi3, Afshin Hasanvand4
1Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
2Division of Pulmonary Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
3Scientific Society of Evidence-Based Knowledge, Research Office for the History of Persian Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
4Student Research Committee, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran

CJMB 2018; 5: 091-094

Viewed : 538 times
Downloaded : 321 times.

Keywords : Small airway disease, Pulmonary disease, COPD, Medical history
Full Text(PDF) | Related Articles
Abstract
Objectives: Since history taking is still the most important part of a medical diagnosis, we tried to find sensitive and specific symptoms and risk factors in order to differentiate small airway disease from other pulmonary diseases. Social factors as well as related past medical history including using spirits of salt (HCL), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and so on were evaluated.

Materials and Methods: The present pilot study consists of 32 cases of small airway disease and 28 cases of other pulmonary diseases. The statistical evaluations were performed through 2 × 2 tables using Fisher exact test adjusted with Bonferroni correction for P values and Yate correction for odds ratios. The sensitivities and the specificities were also reported as we aimed.

Results: Among the 4 symptoms evaluated, having sputum was against small airway disease (Pc = 0.0184; ORc = 0.23). Lack of sputum was 62% sensitive and 75% specific for small airway disease. Among the risk factors evaluated, using HCL showed the highest accuracy (Pc = 0.0004; ORc = 31.4; Sensitivity = 65%; Specificity = 96%; Accuracy = 80.5%). History taking is still the most important part of a medical diagnosis.

Conclusions: Through a suggestive history and physical examination, we can reach a good pretest probability for further evaluation.

 

Cite By, Google Scholar

Google Scholar

Articles by Amiri A
Articles by Hasanvand A

PubMed

Articles by Ali Amiri
Articles by Afshin Hasanvand

Submit Paper
Online Submission System
CJMB ENDNOTE ® Style Tutorials Publication Charge Women's Reproductive Health Research Center About Journal
Publication Information
Publisher
Aras Part Medical International Press Editors in Chief
Arash Khaki
Editor
Zafer Akan Deputy Editor
Javadi, Leila
Published Article Statistics